Here is a list of codes related to the Kitaev surface code.
Code Description
3D surface code Also called the solid code. Stub.
Clifford-deformed surface code (CDSC) A generally non-CSS derivative of the surface code defined by applying a constant-depth Clifford circuit to the original (CSS) surface code. Unlike the surface code, CDSCs include codes whose thresholds and subthreshold performance are enhanced under noise biased towards dephasing. Examples of CDSCs include the XY code, XZZX code, and random CDSCs.
Color code A family of abelian topological CSS stabilizer codes defined on a $$D$$-dimensional lattice which satisfies two properties: The lattice is (1) a homogeneous simplicial $$D$$-complex obtained as a triangulation of the interior of a $$D$$-simplex and (2) is $$D+1$$-colorable. Qubits are placed on the $$D$$-simplices and generators are supported on suitable simplices [1]. For 2-dimensional color code, the lattice must be such that it is 3-valent and has 3-colorable faces, such as a honeycomb lattice. The qubits are placed on the vertices and two stabilizer generators are placed on each face [2].
Double-semion code Stub.
Fractal surface code Kitaev surface code on a fractal geometry, which is obtained by removing qubits from the surface code on a cubic lattice. Stub.
Freedman-Meyer-Luo code Hyperbolic surface code constructed using cellulation of a Riemann Manifold $$M$$ exhibitng systolic freedom [3]. Codes derived from such manifolds can achieve distances scaling better than $$\sqrt{n}$$, something that is impossible using closed 2D surfaces or 2D surfaces with boundaries [4]. Improved codes are obtained by studying a weak family of Riemann metrics on closed 4-dimensional manifolds $$S^2\otimes S^2$$ with the $$Z_2$$-homology.
Guth-Lubotzky code Hyperbolic surface code based on cellulations of certain four-dimensional manifolds. The manifolds are shown to have good homology and systolic properties for the purposes of code construction, with corresponding codes exhibiting linear rate.
Haah cubic code Class of stabilizer codes on a length-$$L$$ cubic lattice with one or two qubits per site. We also require that the stabilizer group $$\mathsf{S}$$ is translation invariant and generated by two types of operators with support on a cube. In the non-CSS case, these two are related by spatial inversion. For CSS codes, we require that the product of all corner operators is the identity. We lastly require that there are no non-trival ''string operators'', meaning that single-site operators are a phase, and any period one logical operator $$l \in \mathsf{S}^{\perp}$$ is just a phase. Haah showed in his original construction that there is exactly one non-CSS code of this form, and 17 CSS codes [5]. The non-CSS code is labeled code 0, and the rest are numbered from 1 - 17. Codes 1-4, 7, 8, and 10 do not have string logical operators [5][6].
Heavy-hexagon code Subsystem stabilizer code on the heavy-hexagonal lattice that combines Bacon-Shor and surface-code stabilizers. Encodes one logical qubit into $$n=(5d^2-2d-1)/2$$ physical qubits with distance $$d$$. The heavy-hexagonal lattice allows for low degree (at most 3) connectivity between all the data and ancilla qubits, which is suitable for fixed-frequency transom qubits subject to frequency collision errors.
Higher-dimensional surface code A family of Kitaev surface codes on planar or toric surfaces of dimension greater than two. Stub.
Honeycomb code Floquet code inspired by the Kitaev honeycomb model [7] whose logical qubits are generated through a particular sequence of measurements.
Hyperbolic surface code An extension of the Kitaev surface code construction to hyperbolic manifolds in dimension two or greater. Given a cellulation of a manifold, qubits are put on $$i$$-dimensional faces, $$X$$-type stabilizers are associated with $$(i-1)$$-faces, while $$Z$$-type stabilizers are associated with $$i+1$$-faces.
Hypergraph product code A family of $$[[n,k,d]]$$ CSS codes whose construction is based on two binary linear seed codes $$C_1$$ and $$C_2$$.
Kitaev surface code A family of abelian topological CSS stabilizer codes whose generators are few-body $$X$$-type and $$Z$$-type Pauli strings associated to the stars and plaquettes, respectively, of a cellulation of a two-dimensional surface (with a qubit located at each edge of the cellulation). Toric code often either refers to the construction on the two-dimensional torus or is an alternative name for the general construction. The construction on surfaces with boundaries is often called the planar code [8].
Lifted-product (LP) code Code that utilizes the notion of a lifted product in its construction. Lifted products of certain classical Tanner codes are the first (asymptotically) good QLDPC codes.
Modular-qudit surface code A family of stabilizer codes whose generators are few-body $$X$$-type and $$Z$$-type Pauli strings associated to the stars and plaquettes, respectively, of a tessellation of a two-dimensional surface (with a qudit located at each edge of the tesselation). The code has $$n=E$$ many physical qudits, where $$E$$ is the number of edges of the tesselation, and $$k=2g$$ many logical qudits, where $$g$$ is the genus of the surface.
Projective-plane surface code A family of Kitaev surface codes on the non-orientable 2-dimensional compact manifold $$\mathbb{R}P^2$$ (in contrast to a genus-$$g$$ surface). Whereas genus-$$g$$ surface codes require $$2g$$ logical qubits, qubit codes on $$\mathbb{R}P^2$$ are made from a single logical qubit.
Quantum-double code A family of topological codes, defined by a finite group $$G$$, whose generators are few-body operators associated to the stars and plaquettes, respectively, of a tessellation of a two-dimensional surface (with a qudit of dimension $$|G|$$ located at each edge of the tesselation).
Raussendorf-Bravyi-Harrington (RBH) code Stub. (see Sec. III E of [9])
Translationally-invariant stabilizer code A geometrically local qubit or qudit stabilizer code with qudits organized on a lattice modeled by the additive group $$\mathbb{Z}^D$$ for spatial dimension $$D$$ such that each lattice point, referred to as a site, contains $$m$$ qudits of dimension $$q$$. The stabilizer group of the translationally invariant code is generated by site-local Pauli operators and their translations.
Two-dimensional hyperbolic surface code Hyperbolic surface codes based on a tessellation of a closed 2D manifold with a hyperbolic geometry (i.e., non-Euclidean geometry, e.g., saddle surfaces when defined on a 2D plane).
XY surface code Non-CSS derivative of the surface code whose generators are $$XXXX$$ and $$YYYY$$, obtained by mapping $$Z \to Y$$ in the surface code.
XZZX surface code Also called a rotated surface code. Non-CSS derivative of the surface code whose generators are $$XZXZ$$ Pauli strings associated, clock-wise, to the vertices of each face of a two-dimensional lattice (with a qubit located at each vertex of the tessellation).
$$[[4,2,2]]$$ CSS code Four-qubit CSS stabilizer code with generators $$\{XXXX, ZZZZ\}$$ and codewords \begin{align} \begin{split} |\overline{00}\rangle = (|0000\rangle + |1111\rangle)/\sqrt{2}~{\phantom{.}}\\ |\overline{01}\rangle = (|0011\rangle + |1100\rangle)/\sqrt{2}~{\phantom{.}}\\ |\overline{10}\rangle = (|0101\rangle + |1010\rangle)/\sqrt{2}~{\phantom{.}}\\ |\overline{11}\rangle = (|0110\rangle + |1001\rangle)/\sqrt{2}~. \end{split} \end{align}

## References

[1]
A. M. Kubica, The Abcs of the Color Code: A Study of Topological Quantum Codes as Toy Models for Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation and Quantum Phases of Matter, California Institute of Technology, 2018. DOI
[2]
H. Bombin, “An Introduction to Topological Quantum Codes”. 1311.0277
[3]
M. H. Freedman, “Z2–Systolic-Freedom”, Proceedings of the Kirbyfest (1999). DOI
[4]
E. Fetaya, “Bounding the distance of quantum surface codes”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 53, 062202 (2012). DOI
[5]
J. Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators”, Physical Review A 83, (2011). DOI; 1101.1962
[6]
A. Dua et al., “Sorting topological stabilizer models in three dimensions”, Physical Review B 100, (2019). DOI; 1908.08049
[7]
A. Kitaev, “Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond”, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006). DOI; cond-mat/0506438
[8]
S. B. Bravyi and A. Yu. Kitaev, “Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary”. quant-ph/9811052
[9]
S. Roberts and S. D. Bartlett, “Symmetry-Protected Self-Correcting Quantum Memories”, Physical Review X 10, (2020). DOI; 1805.01474