[Jump to code hierarchy]

Abelian topological code

Description

Code whose codewords realize topological order associated with an Abelian anyon theory. In 2D, this is equivalent to a unitary braided fusion category which is also an Abelian group under fusion [1]. Unless otherwise noted, the phases discussed are bosonic.

2D Abelian topological codes

A theory is defined by an Abelian group \(A\) of anyon types whose multiplication relations define the fusion rules, and a set of exchange statistics \(\theta(a)\in U(1)\) obtained by exchanging two anyons of type \(a\in A\). The exchange statistics in turn define braiding relations, \begin{align} B(a,b) = \frac{\theta(ab)}{\theta(a)\theta(b)}~, \tag*{(1)}\end{align} between all anyon pairs \(a,b\).

All 2D Abelian bosonic topological orders can be understood within the subsystem stabilizer formalism [2]. As such, many of the operations one can perform on such codes have both a stabilizer and a topological-phase interpretation. Stabilizer generators of 2D topological codes acting on 1D loops of qubits can be interpreted as one-form symmetries of the underlying phase realized by the code. Identification of an anyon \(a\) with the vacuum is equivalent to adding string excitation operators corresponding to \(a\) to the stabilizer group and taking the center to get another stabilizer group. Code states of this new stabilizer code correspond to a condensed phase of the parent topological phase. The remaining unidentified parent-phase anyons behave differently with respect to the new condensed-phase state. Some become confined while the remaining ones pick up new braiding relations.

Gapped anyon theories admit a subgroup of bosons with trivial mutual statistics whose order squares to that of \(G\); see Ref. [3]. In terms of their category theoretic structure, gapped anyon theories admit a Lagrangian subgroup [4,5]. It is conjectured that the logical dimension of an Abelian topological code on a torus is always a square [4].

Rate

\(\mathbb{Z}_N\) topological order cannot exist on any fractal geometry that is embeddable in two Euclidean dimensions [6].

Encoding

Any local quantum circuit connecting ground states of topological orders with non-isomorphic Abelian groups must have depth that is at least linear in the diameter of the system [7].

Gates

Clifford gates can be implemented by braiding defects; for qubit-based stabilizer codes realizing Abelian topological phases, see Refs. [8,9]. Most of such designs focus on the surface code [10–15].

Fault Tolerance

Fault-tolerant logical operations can be interpreted as anyon condensation events [16].Modular decoding, designed to overcome the backlog problem, is applicable to fault-tolerant protocols based on topological qubit stabilizer codes [17].

Cousins

  • Walker-Wang model code— Any Abelian anyon theory \(A\) can be realized at one of the surfaces of a 3D Walker-Wang model whose underlying theory is an Abelian TQD containing \(A\) as a subtheory [18,19][2; Appx. H].
  • 3D lattice stabilizer code— Qubit 3D stabilizer codes are conjectured to admit either fracton phases or abelian topological phases that are equivalent to multiple copies of the 3D surface code and/or the 3D fermionic surface code [20].
  • Gauss' law code— Gauge-group elements of a \(D\)-dimensional fermionic \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory from a single-error-correcting linear binary code [21; Thm. 1]. There is a general correspondence between stabilizer codes and gauge theory, with the stabilizer group playing the role of the gauge group [22], and with the Gauss' law code being a specific example.
  • Plaquette Ising code— The 2D plaquette Ising model can be constructed by coupling layers of 1D \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) lattice gauge theory [23]. A field-theoretic description of the 2D plaquette Ising model can be obtained by coupling layers of 1D gauge theory [24].
  • Classical topological code— Some topological orders have classical analogues that can be used for error correction.
  • Stabilizer code— There is a general correspondence between stabilizer codes and gauge theory, with the stabilizer group playing the role of the gauge group [22].
  • Analog surface code— The analog surface code realizes a straightforward extension of the modular-qudit surface code to infinite local dimension, \(q\to\infty\) [25]. The code realizes a phase of 2D \(\mathbb{R}\) gauge theory. There are two types of anyons, \(e\) and \(m\), with each type being valued in a continuous domain as opposed to \(\mathbb{Z}_q\) for the qudit surface code.
  • \(U(1)_{2n} \times U(1)_{-2m}\) Chern-Simons GKP code— The \(U(1)_{2n} \times U(1)_{-2m}\) Chern-Simons GKP code realizes \(U(1)_{2n} \times U(1)_{-2m}\) Chern-Simons theory on bosonic modes. The code can be obtained from the analog surface code by condensing certain anyons [26].
  • Tiger surface code— The tiger surface code is conjectured to realize phases of \(U(1)\) gauge theory.
  • Lattice subsystem code— All 2D Abelian bosonic topological orders can be realized as modular-qudit lattice subsystem codes by starting with an Abelian quantum double model (slightly different from that of Ref. [3]) along with a family of Abelian TQDs that generalize the double semion anyon theory and gauging out certain bosonic anyons [2]. The stabilizer generators of the new subsystem code may no longer be geometrically local. Lattice subsystem stabilizer code Hamiltonians described by an Abelian anyon theory do not always realize the corresponding anyonic topological order in their ground-state subspace and may exhibit a rich phase diagram. Non-Abelian topological orders are purported not to be realizable with Pauli stabilizer codes [27].
  • Dynamical code— Useful measurement sequences of dynamical codes can be extracted from topological quantum field theory [28].
  • Chen-Hsin invertible-order code— Instances of the code in 4D realize the 3D \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory with fermionic charge and either bosonic (FcBl) or fermionic (FcFl) loop excitations at their boundaries [29,30]; see Ref. [31] for a different lattice-model formulation of the FcBl boundary code.
  • Quantum repetition code— The 1D quantum repetition code is an ingredient in product constructions that yield several topological phases [32; Fig. 8].
  • Bivariate bicycle (BB) code— BB codes have been investigated in terms of their anyons and topological order [33].
  • Qubit CSS code— The mapping of qubit CSS codes to chain complexes allows the application of structures from topology to error correction. Chain complexes describing some QLDPC codes [34,35], and, more generally, CSS codes [36] can be 'lifted' into higher-dimensional manifolds admitting some notion of geometric locality. Qubit CSS codes admit several dualities [37,38].
  • Twist-defect color code— Twist-defect color codes realize \(\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2\) topological order with twist defects.
  • Twist-defect surface code— Twist-defect surface codes realize \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) topological order with twist defects.
  • Three-fermion (3F) Walker-Wang model code— When treated as ground states of the code Hamiltonian, 3F Walker-Wang model code states realize a 3D time-reversal SPT order [39]. The anyons at the boundary of the lattice are described by the 3F anyon theory.

Member of code lists

Primary Hierarchy

Quantum Domain
Quantum code
Operator-algebra QECC (OAQECC)
Quantum error-correcting code (QECC)
Block quantum code
Topological codeHamiltonian-based QECC Quantum
Parents
Topological code
Abelian topological code
Children
Abelian TQD codeCDSC Kitaev surface
Abelian TQDs realize all modular gapped Abelian topological orders [3]. Conversely, every Abelian anyon theory is a subtheory of some TQD [2; Sec. 6.2]. Any Abelian anyon theory \(A\) can be realized at one of the surfaces of a 3D Walker-Wang model whose underlying theory is an Abelian TQD containing \(A\) as a subtheory [18,19][2; Appx. H].
Compactified \(\mathbb{R}\) gauge theory code
The compactified \(\mathbb{R}\) gauge theory code can be obtained from the analog surface code by condensing certain anyons [26]. This results in a pinning of each mode to the space of periodic functions, which make up a physical rotor, and can be thought of as compactification of the 2D \(\mathbb{R}\) gauge theory phase realized by the analog surface code.
Majorana box qubit
When treated as ground states of the code Hamiltonian, codewords of a single Kitaev chain realize \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) fermionic topological order.
Layer code
The Layer code realizes 2D layers of \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory coupled along defects.
3D color code
3D fermionic surface code
The 3D Kitaev surface code realizes 3D \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory with fermionic charge and bosonic loop excitations (FcBl), i.e., with an emergent fermion.
\((1,3)\) 4D toric code
The \((1,3)\) 4D toric code realizes 4D \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory with 1D \(Z\)-type and 3D \(X\)-type logical operators.
Loop toric code
The 4D loop toric code realizes 4D \(\mathbb{Z}_2\) gauge theory with only loop excitations [40].
Qudit 3D surface code
The qudit 3D surface code realizes 3D \(\mathbb{Z}_q\) gauge theory with bosonic charge and loop excitations (BcBl).
3D Kitaev honeycomb code
One of the phases realized by the 3D Kitaev honeycomb Hamiltonian is that of the 3D fermionic surface code [41].
Three-fermion (3F) subsystem code
The 3F code is a 2D subsystem code characterized by 3F topological order [2], which is chiral and modular.
\(\mathbb{Z}_q^{(1)}\) subsystem code
The \(\mathbb{Z}_q^{(1)}\) subsystem code is characterized by the \(\mathbb{Z}_q^{(1)}\) anyon theory [42]. The anyon theory has a single generator \(a \in \mathbb Z_N\) with \(\theta(a) =e^{\frac{2\pi i}{N}a^2}\). It is modular for odd prime \(q\) and non-modular otherwise.
Chiral semion subsystem code
The semion code is a subsystem code characterized by the chiral semion topological phase.
\(\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_9\)-fusion subsystem code
The \(\mathbb{Z}_q^{(1)}\) subsystem code is characterized by a non-modular anyon theory with \(\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_9\) fusion rules.

References

[1]
L. Wang and Z. Wang, “In and around abelian anyon models \({}^{\text{*}}\)”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 505203 (2020) arXiv:2004.12048 DOI
[2]
T. D. Ellison, Y.-A. Chen, A. Dua, W. Shirley, N. Tantivasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, “Pauli topological subsystem codes from Abelian anyon theories”, Quantum 7, 1137 (2023) arXiv:2211.03798 DOI
[3]
T. D. Ellison, Y.-A. Chen, A. Dua, W. Shirley, N. Tantivasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, “Pauli Stabilizer Models of Twisted Quantum Doubles”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2112.11394 DOI
[4]
A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, “Topological boundary conditions in abelian Chern–Simons theory”, Nuclear Physics B 845, 393 (2011) arXiv:1008.0654 DOI
[5]
J. Kaidi, Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, S. Seifnashri, and S.-H. Shao, “Higher central charges and topological boundaries in 2+1-dimensional TQFTs”, SciPost Physics 13, (2022) arXiv:2107.13091 DOI
[6]
G. Zhu, T. Jochym-O’Connor, and A. Dua, “Topological Order, Quantum Codes, and Quantum Computation on Fractal Geometries”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2108.00018 DOI
[7]
J. Haah, “An Invariant of Topologically Ordered States Under Local Unitary Transformations”, Communications in Mathematical Physics 342, 771 (2016) arXiv:1407.2926 DOI
[8]
M. Barkeshli, C.-M. Jian, and X.-L. Qi, “Theory of defects in Abelian topological states”, Physical Review B 88, (2013) arXiv:1305.7203 DOI
[9]
Y. D. Lensky, K. Kechedzhi, I. Aleiner, and E.-A. Kim, “Graph gauge theory of mobile non-Abelian anyons in a qubit stabilizer code”, Annals of Physics 452, 169286 (2023) arXiv:2210.09282 DOI
[10]
H. Bombin, “Topological Order with a Twist: Ising Anyons from an Abelian Model”, Physical Review Letters 105, (2010) arXiv:1004.1838 DOI
[11]
A. Kitaev and L. Kong, “Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls”, Communications in Mathematical Physics 313, 351 (2012) arXiv:1104.5047 DOI
[12]
A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation”, Physical Review A 86, (2012) arXiv:1208.0928 DOI
[13]
H. Zheng, A. Dua, and L. Jiang, “Demonstrating non-Abelian statistics of Majorana fermions using twist defects”, Physical Review B 92, (2015) arXiv:1508.04166 DOI
[14]
B. J. Brown, K. Laubscher, M. S. Kesselring, and J. R. Wootton, “Poking Holes and Cutting Corners to Achieve Clifford Gates with the Surface Code”, Physical Review X 7, (2017) arXiv:1609.04673 DOI
[15]
A. Benhemou, J. K. Pachos, and D. E. Browne, “Non-Abelian statistics with mixed-boundary punctures on the toric code”, Physical Review A 105, (2022) arXiv:2103.08381 DOI
[16]
M. S. Kesselring, J. C. Magdalena de la Fuente, F. Thomsen, J. Eisert, S. D. Bartlett, and B. J. Brown, “Anyon Condensation and the Color Code”, PRX Quantum 5, (2024) arXiv:2212.00042 DOI
[17]
H. Bombín, C. Dawson, Y.-H. Liu, N. Nickerson, F. Pastawski, and S. Roberts, “Modular decoding: parallelizable real-time decoding for quantum computers”, (2023) arXiv:2303.04846
[18]
J. Haah, “Clifford quantum cellular automata: Trivial group in 2D and Witt group in 3D”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 62, (2021) arXiv:1907.02075 DOI
[19]
W. Shirley, Y.-A. Chen, A. Dua, T. D. Ellison, N. Tantivasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, “Three-Dimensional Quantum Cellular Automata from Chiral Semion Surface Topological Order and beyond”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2202.05442 DOI
[20]
A. Dua, I. H. Kim, M. Cheng, and D. J. Williamson, “Sorting topological stabilizer models in three dimensions”, Physical Review B 100, (2019) arXiv:1908.08049 DOI
[21]
L. Spagnoli, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe, “Fault-tolerant simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories with gauge covariant codes”, (2024) arXiv:2405.19293
[22]
S. Carrozza, A. Chatwin-Davies, P. A. Hoehn, and F. M. Mele, “A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames”, (2024) arXiv:2412.15317
[23]
B. Rayhaun and D. Williamson, “Higher-form subsystem symmetry breaking: Subdimensional criticality and fracton phase transitions”, SciPost Physics 15, (2023) arXiv:2112.12735 DOI
[24]
P. Gorantla, A. Prem, N. Tantivasadakarn, and D. J. Williamson, “String-Membrane-Nets from Higher-Form Gauging: An Alternate Route to \(p\)-String Condensation”, (2025) arXiv:2505.13604
[25]
V. V. Albert, S. Pascazio, and M. H. Devoret, “General phase spaces: from discrete variables to rotor and continuum limits”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 504002 (2017) arXiv:1709.04460 DOI
[26]
J. C. M. de la Fuente, T. D. Ellison, M. Cheng, and D. J. Williamson, “Topological stabilizer models on continuous variables”, (2025) arXiv:2411.04993
[27]
A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, “Symmetry constraints on many-body localization”, Physical Review B 94, (2016) arXiv:1605.03601 DOI
[28]
M. Davydova, N. Tantivasadakarn, S. Balasubramanian, and D. Aasen, “Quantum computation from dynamic automorphism codes”, Quantum 8, 1448 (2024) arXiv:2307.10353 DOI
[29]
T. Johnson-Freyd, “(3+1)D topological orders with only a \(\mathbb{Z}_2\)-charged particle”, (2020) arXiv:2011.11165
[30]
L. Fidkowski, J. Haah, and M. B. Hastings, “Gravitational anomaly of (3+1) -dimensional Z2 toric code with fermionic charges and fermionic loop self-statistics”, Physical Review B 106, (2022) arXiv:2110.14654 DOI
[31]
L. Fidkowski, J. Haah, and M. B. Hastings, “Exactly solvable model for a 4+1D beyond-cohomology symmetry-protected topological phase”, Physical Review B 101, (2020) arXiv:1912.05565 DOI
[32]
T. Rakovszky and V. Khemani, “The Physics of (good) LDPC Codes II. Product constructions”, (2024) arXiv:2402.16831
[33]
K. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Liang, Y.-A. Chen, K. Liu, and H. Song, “Anyon Theory and Topological Frustration of High-Efficiency Quantum LDPC Codes”, (2025) arXiv:2503.04699
[34]
M. Freedman and M. B. Hastings, “Building manifolds from quantum codes”, (2021) arXiv:2012.02249
[35]
T.-C. Lin, A. Wills, and M.-H. Hsieh, “Geometrically Local Quantum and Classical Codes from Subdivision”, (2024) arXiv:2309.16104
[36]
V. Guemard, “Lifts of quantum CSS codes”, (2024) arXiv:2404.16736
[37]
M. H. Zarei, “Strong-weak coupling duality between two perturbed quantum many-body systems: Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes and Ising-like systems”, Physical Review B 96, (2017) arXiv:1710.02646 DOI
[38]
T. Rakovszky and V. Khemani, “The Physics of (good) LDPC Codes I. Gauging and dualities”, (2023) arXiv:2310.16032
[39]
F. J. Burnell, X. Chen, L. Fidkowski, and A. Vishwanath, “Exactly soluble model of a three-dimensional symmetry-protected topological phase of bosons with surface topological order”, Physical Review B 90, (2014) arXiv:1302.7072 DOI
[40]
X. Chen, A. Dua, P.-S. Hsin, C.-M. Jian, W. Shirley, and C. Xu, “Loops in 4+1d topological phases”, SciPost Physics 15, (2023) arXiv:2112.02137 DOI
[41]
S. Mandal and N. Surendran, “Exactly solvable Kitaev model in three dimensions”, Physical Review B 79, (2009) arXiv:0801.0229 DOI
[42]
P. H. Bonderson, Non-Abelian Anyons and Interferometry, California Institute of Technology, 2007 DOI
Page edit log

Your contribution is welcome!

on github.com (edit & pull request)— see instructions

edit on this site

Zoo Code ID: topological_abelian

Cite as:
“Abelian topological code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/topological_abelian
BibTeX:
@incollection{eczoo_topological_abelian, title={Abelian topological code}, booktitle={The Error Correction Zoo}, year={2022}, editor={Albert, Victor V. and Faist, Philippe}, url={https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/topological_abelian} }
Share via:
Twitter | Mastodon |  | E-mail
Permanent link:
https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/topological_abelian

Cite as:

“Abelian topological code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/topological_abelian

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/edit/main/codes/quantum/properties/block/topological/topological_abelian.yml.