Two-component cat code[1]
Description
Code whose codespace is spanned by two coherent states \(\left|\pm\alpha\right\rangle\) for nonzero complex \(\alpha\).
An orthonormal basis for the codespace consists of the bosonic cat states [2] \begin{align} |\overline{\pm}\rangle=\frac{\left|\alpha\right\rangle \pm\left|-\alpha\right\rangle }{\sqrt{2\left(1\pm e^{-2|\alpha|^{2}}\right)}} \tag*{(1)}\end{align} for any complex \(\alpha\).
A closely related approximate cat code is called T4C code [3].
Protection
Two-component cat codes for large \(\alpha\) provide protection against modal dephasing, i.e., diffusion of the angular degree of freedom of the mode. A single photon loss event maps the even and odd cat states approximately into each other and therefore acts as a logical bit flip rather than being corrected by the code. There exist modifications based on sign alternation [4], squeezing (yielding squeezed cat codes) [5–7], detuning [8], and addition of higher-order nonlinearities [9] that can add such protection.Encoding
Lindbladian-based dissipative encoding and autonomous QEC [10] utilizing two-photon absorption [11–15]. Encoding passively protects against cavity dephasing, suppressing dephasing noise exponentially with \(|\alpha|^2\) [10]. See Refs. [16,17] for analyses using displaced Fock states [18,19]. The Keldysh formalism yields non-perturbative bit-flip rates under various types of noise [20].Hamiltonian-based ‘Kerr-cat’ encoding utilizing the Kerr-effect Hamiltonian [21] (see also Ref. [22]).Colored dissipation [23].Combined dissipative and Hamiltonian-based encoding utilizing two-photon exchange with an ancillary qubit [24].Critical encoding at nonzero detuning [25].Gates
Universal gates in the quantum optical setting can be performed using teleportation, Bell measurements, displacements, and rotations [26]. An earlier protocol requires a nonlinear interaction and uses state teleportation [27].Universal gates in the microwave setting can be performed using displacement operators and a rotation based on the Kerr nonlinearity [10]. Kerr nonlinearity converts coherent states into Yurke-Stoler states [28].Cat codes admit a noise bias-preserving Hamiltonian-based CNOT gate, utilizing an \(X\) gate with a topological Berry phase [29,30], and a bias-preserving SWAP gate [31]. The CNOT gate is part of a universal noise-bias-preserving gate set that can be made fault tolerant using concatenation [29,30].Cat-transmon entangling gate using an ancillary qubit [32].Decoding
All-optical decoder [33] based on Knill error correction (a.k.a. telecorrection [34]), which is based on teleportation [35,36].Fault Tolerance
Fault-tolerant error-correction procedure using small amplitude coherent states [37].Cat codes admit a noise bias-preserving Hamiltonian-based CNOT gate, utilizing an \(X\) gate with a topological Berry phase [29,30], and a bias-preserving SWAP gate [31]. The CNOT gate is part of a universal noise-bias-preserving gate set that can be made fault tolerant using concatenation [29,30].Realizations
Lindbladian-based dissipative [38,39] and Hamiltonian-based ‘Kerr-cat’ [40] encodings have been achieved in superconducting circuit devices by the Devoret group; Ref. [39] also demonstrated a displacement-based gate. The Lindbladian-based scheme has further achieved a suppression of bit-flip errors that is exponential in the average photon number up to a bit-flip time of 1ms [41]. A bit-flip time of up to 10s has been achieved for the two-component cat code in the classical-bit regime [42–44]. A holonomic gate has been repurposed as a logical measurement [45]. The ‘Kerr-cat’ encoding and a \(\pi/2\) gate have been realized with the help of a band-block filter, yielding a bit-flip lifetime of 1 ms in the 10-photon regime [46] (see also Ref. [47]). Lindblad-based encoding achieved in a 2D cavity by AWS [48].T4C code realized in a superconducting circuit device by the Wang group [3].Notes
Pedagogical introduction to cat codes in the context of microwave cavities can be found in Refs. [49,50], and in the context of optical systems in books [51–53].Ground states of the fluxonium superconducting qubit resemble two-component cat codewords [54].Cousins
- Hamiltonian-based code— The two-component cat code forms the ground-state subspace of a Kerr Hamiltonian [21].
- Quantum repetition code— Two-component cat and quantum repetition codes can be thought of as classical codes because they protect against only one type of noise. Two-component cat codes (quantum repetition) codes suppress cavity dephasing (bit-flip) noise exponentially with \(|\alpha|^2\) (\(n\)). The stability offered by cat codes has been linked to several favorable properties of phases of matter associated with the repetition-code Hamiltonian [55,56].
- Coherent-state c-q code— Two-component cat codes can be thought of as coherent-state c-q codes because they protect against only one type of noise and thus only reliably store classical information.
- Asymmetric quantum code— Cat codes admit a noise bias-preserving Hamiltonian-based CNOT gate, utilizing an \(X\) gate with a topological Berry phase [29,30], and a bias-preserving SWAP gate [31]. The CNOT gate is part of a universal noise-bias-preserving gate set that can be made fault tolerant using concatenation [29,30].
- Binary PSK (BPSK) code— BPSK (two-component cat) codes are used to transmit classical (quantum) information using (superpositions of) antipodal coherent states over classical (quantum) channels.
- BPSK c-q code— BPSK c-q (two-component cat) codes are used to transmit classical (quantum) information using (superpositions of) antipodal coherent states over quantum channels.
- Qubit stabilizer code— Ancilla modes can be used for syndrome extraction instead of ancilla qubits [57], and using two-component cat codes [58] yields fault-tolerant syndrome extraction circuits.
- Spin cat code— The spin-cat code construction utilizes the Holstein-Primakoff mapping [59–61] to convert cat codes into codes for spin systems.
Member of code lists
- Approximate quantum codes
- Asymmetric quantum codes and friends
- Bosonic Fock-state codes
- Concatenated quantum codes and friends
- Hamiltonian-based codes and friends
- Monolithic quantum codes and friends
- Quantum codes
- Quantum codes with fault-tolerant gadgets
- Quantum codes with notable decoders
- Quantum LDPC codes
- Realized quantum codes
Primary Hierarchy
Parents
The cat code reduces to its two-component version for \(S=0\).
The coherent-state repetition code for \(n=1\) reduces to the two-component cat code.
The squeezed cat code reduces to the two-component cat code when there is no squeezing.
Two-component cat code
References
- [1]
- P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, “Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping”, Physical Review A 59, 2631 (1999) arXiv:quant-ph/9809037 DOI
- [2]
- V. V. Dodonov, I. A. Malkin, and V. I. Man’ko, “Even and odd coherent states and excitations of a singular oscillator”, Physica 72, 597 (1974) DOI
- [3]
- J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, and C. Wang, “Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction”, Nature 590, 243 (2021) arXiv:2004.09322 DOI
- [4]
- L. Li, D. J. Young, V. V. Albert, K. Noh, C.-L. Zou, and L. Jiang, “Phase-engineered bosonic quantum codes”, Physical Review A 103, (2021) arXiv:1901.05358 DOI
- [5]
- D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, “Quantum error correction using squeezed Schrödinger cat states”, Physical Review A 106, (2022) arXiv:2201.02570 DOI
- [6]
- Q. Xu, G. Zheng, Y.-X. Wang, P. Zoller, A. A. Clerk, and L. Jiang, “Autonomous quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation with squeezed cat qubits”, (2022) arXiv:2210.13406
- [7]
- T. Hillmann and F. Quijandría, “Quantum error correction with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits”, Physical Review A 107, (2023) arXiv:2210.13359 DOI
- [8]
- D. Ruiz, R. Gautier, J. Guillaud, and M. Mirrahimi, “Two-photon driven Kerr quantum oscillator with multiple spectral degeneracies”, Physical Review A 107, (2023) arXiv:2211.03689 DOI
- [9]
- A. Labay-Mora, A. Mercurio, V. Savona, G. L. Giorgi, and F. Minganti, “Chiral cat code: Enhanced error correction induced by higher-order nonlinearities”, (2025) arXiv:2503.11624
- [10]
- M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, “Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation”, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014) arXiv:1312.2017 DOI
- [11]
- M. Wolinsky and H. J. Carmichael, “Quantum noise in the parametric oscillator: From squeezed states to coherent-state superpositions”, Physical Review Letters 60, 1836 (1988) DOI
- [12]
- L. Krippner, W. J. Munro, and M. D. Reid, “Transient macroscopic quantum superposition states in degenerate parametric oscillation: Calculations in the large-quantum-noise limit using the positivePrepresentation”, Physical Review A 50, 4330 (1994) DOI
- [13]
- E. E. Hach III and C. C. Gerry, “Generation of mixtures of Schrödinger-cat states from a competitive two-photon process”, Physical Review A 49, 490 (1994) DOI
- [14]
- L. Gilles, B. M. Garraway, and P. L. Knight, “Generation of nonclassical light by dissipative two-photon processes”, Physical Review A 49, 2785 (1994) DOI
- [15]
- J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Quantum Reservoir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions”, Physical Review Letters 77, 4728 (1996) DOI
- [16]
- C. Chamberland et al., “Building a Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2012.04108 DOI
- [17]
- K. S. Dubovitskii, “Bit-flip errors in dissipative cat qubits: Second-order perturbation theory”, Physical Review A 111, (2025) arXiv:2407.17299 DOI
- [18]
- A. Wunsche, “Displaced Fock states and their connection to quasiprobabilities”, Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 3, 359 (1991) DOI
- [19]
- T. G. Philbin, “Generalized coherent states”, American Journal of Physics 82, 742 (2014) arXiv:1311.1920 DOI
- [20]
- L. Carde, R. Gautier, N. Didier, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen, and A. McDonald, “Non-perturbative switching rates in bistable open quantum systems: from driven Kerr oscillators to dissipative cat qubits”, (2025) arXiv:2507.18714
- [21]
- S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, “Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving”, npj Quantum Information 3, (2017) arXiv:1605.09408 DOI
- [22]
- H. Goto, “Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network”, Scientific Reports 6, (2016) arXiv:1510.02566 DOI
- [23]
- H. Putterman, J. Iverson, Q. Xu, L. Jiang, O. Painter, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and K. Noh, “Stabilizing a Bosonic Qubit Using Colored Dissipation”, Physical Review Letters 128, (2022) arXiv:2107.09198 DOI
- [24]
- R. Gautier, A. Sarlette, and M. Mirrahimi, “Combined Dissipative and Hamiltonian Confinement of Cat Qubits”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2112.05545 DOI
- [25]
- L. Gravina, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, “Critical Schrödinger Cat Qubit”, PRX Quantum 4, (2023) arXiv:2208.04928 DOI
- [26]
- T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, “Quantum computation with optical coherent states”, Physical Review A 68, (2003) arXiv:quant-ph/0306004 DOI
- [27]
- H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, “Efficient quantum computation using coherent states”, Physical Review A 65, (2002) arXiv:quant-ph/0109077 DOI
- [28]
- B. Yurke and D. Stoler, “Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscopically distinguishable states via amplitude dispersion”, Physical Review Letters 57, 13 (1986) DOI
- [29]
- J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, “Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation”, Physical Review X 9, (2019) arXiv:1904.09474 DOI
- [30]
- S. Puri et al., “Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits”, Science Advances 6, (2020) arXiv:1905.00450 DOI
- [31]
- J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, “Error rates and resource overheads of repetition cat qubits”, Physical Review A 103, (2021) arXiv:2009.10756 DOI
- [32]
- C. T. Hann, K. Noh, H. Putterman, M. H. Matheny, J. K. Iverson, M. T. Fang, C. Chamberland, O. Painter, and F. G. S. L. Brandão, “Hybrid Cat-Transmon Architecture for Scalable, Hardware-Efficient Quantum Error Correction”, PRX Quantum 6, (2025) arXiv:2410.23363 DOI
- [33]
- J. Hastrup and U. L. Andersen, “All-optical cat-code quantum error correction”, (2021) arXiv:2108.12225
- [34]
- C. M. Dawson, H. L. Haselgrove, and M. A. Nielsen, “Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation”, Physical Review A 73, (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0601066 DOI
- [35]
- E. Knill, “Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices”, Nature 434, 39 (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0410199 DOI
- [36]
- E. Knill, “Scalable Quantum Computation in the Presence of Large Detected-Error Rates”, (2004) arXiv:quant-ph/0312190
- [37]
- A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, “Fault-Tolerant Linear Optical Quantum Computing with Small-Amplitude Coherent States”, Physical Review Letters 100, (2008) arXiv:0707.0327 DOI
- [38]
- Z. Leghtas et al., “Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss”, Science 347, 853 (2015) arXiv:1412.4633 DOI
- [39]
- S. Touzard et al., “Coherent Oscillations inside a Quantum Manifold Stabilized by Dissipation”, Physical Review X 8, (2018) arXiv:1705.02401 DOI
- [40]
- A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, “Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit”, Nature 584, 205 (2020) arXiv:1907.12131 DOI
- [41]
- R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, “Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator”, Nature Physics 16, 509 (2020) arXiv:1907.11729 DOI
- [42]
- C. Berdou et al., “One Hundred Second Bit-Flip Time in a Two-Photon Dissipative Oscillator”, PRX Quantum 4, (2023) arXiv:2204.09128 DOI
- [43]
- U. Réglade et al., “Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds”, Nature 629, 778 (2024) arXiv:2307.06617 DOI
- [44]
- A. Marquet et al., “Autoparametric Resonance Extending the Bit-Flip Time of a Cat Qubit up to 0.3 s”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2307.06761 DOI
- [45]
- V. V. Albert, C. Shu, S. Krastanov, C. Shen, R.-B. Liu, Z.-B. Yang, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and L. Jiang, “Holonomic Quantum Control with Continuous Variable Systems”, Physical Review Letters 116, (2016) arXiv:1503.00194 DOI
- [46]
- A. Hajr et al., “High-Coherence Kerr-Cat Qubit in 2D Architecture”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2404.16697 DOI
- [47]
- N. E. Frattini et al., “Observation of Pairwise Level Degeneracies and the Quantum Regime of the Arrhenius Law in a Double-Well Parametric Oscillator”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2209.03934 DOI
- [48]
- H. Putterman et al., “Preserving Phase Coherence and Linearity in Cat Qubits with Exponential Bit-Flip Suppression”, Physical Review X 15, (2025) arXiv:2409.17556 DOI
- [49]
- J. Guillaud, J. Cohen, and M. Mirrahimi, “Quantum computation with cat qubits”, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes (2023) arXiv:2203.03222 DOI
- [50]
- S. Puri, QEC when the noise is biased, 2019.
- [51]
- S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum (Oxford University Press, 2006) DOI
- [52]
- H. Jeong and T. C. Ralph, “Schrödinger Cat States for Quantum Information Processing”, Quantum Information with Continuous Variables of Atoms and Light 159 (2007) DOI
- [53]
- H. Bachor and T. C. Ralph, A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics (Wiley, 2019) DOI
- [54]
- S. Lieu, E. L. Rosenfeld, K. Noh, and C. T. Hann, “Viewing protected superconducting qubits through the lens of the cat qubit”, Physical Review A 112, (2025) arXiv:2501.16425 DOI
- [55]
- F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, “Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions”, Physical Review A 98, (2018) arXiv:1804.11293 DOI
- [56]
- S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, “Symmetry Breaking and Error Correction in Open Quantum Systems”, Physical Review Letters 125, (2020) arXiv:2008.02816 DOI
- [57]
- F. Yamaguchi, K. Nemoto, and W. J. Munro, “Quantum error correction via robust probe modes”, Physical Review A 73, (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0511098 DOI
- [58]
- S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and S. M. Girvin, “Stabilized Cat in a Driven Nonlinear Cavity: A Fault-Tolerant Error Syndrome Detector”, Physical Review X 9, (2019) arXiv:1807.09334 DOI
- [59]
- T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, “Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet”, Physical Review 58, 1098 (1940) DOI
- [60]
- C. D. Cushen and R. L. Hudson, “A quantum-mechanical central limit theorem”, Journal of Applied Probability 8, 454 (1971) DOI
- [61]
- A. Klein and E. R. Marshalek, “Boson realizations of Lie algebras with applications to nuclear physics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 63, 375 (1991) DOI
Page edit log
- Victor V. Albert (2022-11-06) — most recent
- Hyunseok Jeong (2022-11-06)
Cite as:
“Two-component cat code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/two-legged-cat