[Jump to code hierarchy]

Two-component cat code [1]

Description

Code whose codespace is spanned by two coherent states \(\left|\pm\alpha\right\rangle\) for nonzero complex \(\alpha\).

An orthonormal basis for the codespace consists of the bosonic cat states [2] \begin{align} |\overline{\pm}\rangle=\frac{\left|\alpha\right\rangle \pm\left|-\alpha\right\rangle }{\sqrt{2\left(1\pm e^{-2|\alpha|^{2}}\right)}}\tag*{$(1)$} \end{align}for any complex \(\alpha\).

A closely related approximate cat code is called T4C code [3].

Protection

Two-component cat codes for large \(\alpha\) provide protection against modal dephasing, i.e., diffusion of the angular degree of freedom of the mode. A single photon loss event maps the even and odd cat states approximately into each other and therefore acts as a logical bit flip rather than being corrected by the code. There exist modifications based on sign alternation [4], squeezing (yielding squeezed cat codes) [5–7], detuning [8], and addition of higher-order nonlinearities [9] that can add such protection.

Encoding

Lindbladian-based dissipative encoding and autonomous QEC [10] utilizing two-photon absorption [11–15]. Encoding passively protects against cavity dephasing, suppressing dephasing noise exponentially with \(|\alpha|^2\) [10]. See Refs. [16,17] for analyses using displaced Fock states [18,19]. The Keldysh formalism yields non-perturbative bit-flip rates under various types of noise [20].Hamiltonian-based ‘Kerr-cat’ encoding utilizing the Kerr-effect Hamiltonian [21] (see also Ref. [22]).Colored dissipation [23].Combined dissipative and Hamiltonian-based encoding utilizing two-photon exchange with an ancillary qubit [24].Critical encoding at nonzero detuning [25].

Gates

Universal gates in the quantum optical setting can be performed using teleportation, Bell measurements, displacements, and rotations [26]. An earlier protocol requires a nonlinear interaction and uses state teleportation [27].Universal gates in the microwave setting can be performed using displacement operators and a rotation based on the Kerr nonlinearity [10]. Kerr nonlinearity converts coherent states into Yurke-Stoler states [28].Bias-preserving \(X\), CNOT, and Toffoli gates [29,30]. A bias-preserving SWAP gate has also been proposed [31].Cat-transmon entangling gate using an ancillary qubit [32].

Decoding

All-optical decoder [33] based on Knill error correction (a.k.a. telecorrection [34]), which is based on teleportation [35,36].

Fault Tolerance

Fault-tolerant error-correction procedure using small amplitude coherent states [37].Bias-preserving \(X\), CNOT, and Toffoli gates [29,30]. A bias-preserving SWAP gate has also been proposed [31].

Realizations

Lindbladian-based dissipative [38,39] and Hamiltonian-based ‘Kerr-cat’ [40] encodings have been achieved in superconducting circuit devices by the Devoret group; Ref. [39] also demonstrated a displacement-based gate. The Lindbladian-based scheme has further achieved a suppression of bit-flip errors that is exponential in the average photon number up to a bit-flip time of 1ms [41]. A bit-flip time of up to 10s has been achieved for the two-component cat code in the classical-bit regime [42–44]. A holonomic gate has been repurposed as a logical measurement [45]. The ‘Kerr-cat’ encoding and a \(\pi/2\) gate have been realized with the help of a band-block filter, yielding a bit-flip lifetime of 1 ms in the 10-photon regime [46] (see also Ref. [47]). Lindblad-based encoding achieved in a 2D cavity by AWS [48].T4C code realized in a superconducting circuit device by the Wang group [3].

Notes

Pedagogical introduction to cat codes in the context of microwave cavities can be found in Refs. [49,50], and in the context of optical systems in books [51–53].Ground states of the fluxonium superconducting qubit resemble two-component cat codewords [54].

Cousins

  • Hamiltonian-based code— The two-component cat code forms the ground-state subspace of a Kerr Hamiltonian [21].
  • Quantum repetition code— Two-component cat and quantum repetition codes can be thought of as classical codes because they protect against only one type of noise. Two-component cat codes (quantum repetition) codes suppress cavity dephasing (bit-flip) noise exponentially with \(|\alpha|^2\) (\(n\)). The stability offered by cat codes has been linked to several favorable properties of phases of matter associated with the repetition-code Hamiltonian [55,56].
  • Coherent-state c-q modulation format— Two-component cat codes can be thought of as coherent-state c-q codes because they protect against only one type of noise and thus only reliably store classical information.
  • Asymmetric quantum code (AQC)— Cat qubits provide an asymmetric-noise platform admitting bias-preserving \(X\), CNOT, and Toffoli gates [29,30]. A bias-preserving SWAP gate has also been proposed [31].
  • Binary PSK (BPSK) modulation format— BPSK (two-component cat) codes are used to transmit classical (quantum) information using (superpositions of) antipodal coherent states over classical (quantum) channels.
  • BPSK c-q modulation format— BPSK c-q (two-component cat) codes are used to transmit classical (quantum) information using (superpositions of) antipodal coherent states over quantum channels.
  • Qubit stabilizer code— Ancilla modes can be used for syndrome extraction instead of ancilla qubits [57], and using two-component cat codes [58] yields fault-tolerant syndrome extraction circuits.
  • Spin cat code— The spin-cat code construction utilizes the Holstein-Primakoff mapping [59–61] to convert cat codes into codes for spin systems.

Primary Hierarchy

Parents
The cat code reduces to its two-component version for \(S=0\).
The coherent-state repetition code for \(n=1\) reduces to the two-component cat code.
The squeezed cat code reduces to the two-component cat code when there is no squeezing.
Two-component cat code

References

  1. [1]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, “Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping”, Physical Review A 59, 2631 (1999) arXiv:quant-ph/9809037 DOI

  2. [2]

    V. V. Dodonov, I. A. Malkin, and V. I. Man’ko, “Even and odd coherent states and excitations of a singular oscillator”, Physica 72, 597 (1974) DOI

  3. [3]

    J. M. Gertler, B. Baker, J. Li, S. Shirol, J. Koch, and C. Wang, “Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction”, Nature 590, 243 (2021) arXiv:2004.09322 DOI

  4. [4]

    L. Li, D. J. Young, V. V. Albert, K. Noh, C.-L. Zou, and L. Jiang, “Phase-engineered bosonic quantum codes”, Physical Review A 103, (2021) arXiv:1901.05358 DOI

  5. [5]

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, “Quantum error correction using squeezed Schrödinger cat states”, Physical Review A 106, (2022) arXiv:2201.02570 DOI

  6. [6]

    Q. Xu, G. Zheng, Y.-X. Wang, P. Zoller, A. A. Clerk, and L. Jiang, “Autonomous quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation with squeezed cat qubits”, (2022) arXiv:2210.13406

  7. [7]

    T. Hillmann and F. Quijandría, “Quantum error correction with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits”, Physical Review A 107, (2023) arXiv:2210.13359 DOI

  8. [8]

    D. Ruiz, R. Gautier, J. Guillaud, and M. Mirrahimi, “Two-photon driven Kerr quantum oscillator with multiple spectral degeneracies”, Physical Review A 107, (2023) arXiv:2211.03689 DOI

  9. [9]

    A. Labay-Mora, A. Mercurio, V. Savona, G. L. Giorgi, and F. Minganti, “Chiral cat code: Enhanced error correction induced by higher-order nonlinearities”, (2025) arXiv:2503.11624

  10. [10]

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, “Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation”, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014) arXiv:1312.2017 DOI

  11. [11]

    M. Wolinsky and H. J. Carmichael, “Quantum noise in the parametric oscillator: From squeezed states to coherent-state superpositions”, Physical Review Letters 60, 1836 (1988) DOI

  12. [12]

    L. Krippner, W. J. Munro, and M. D. Reid, “Transient macroscopic quantum superposition states in degenerate parametric oscillation: Calculations in the large-quantum-noise limit using the positivePrepresentation”, Physical Review A 50, 4330 (1994) DOI

  13. [13]

    E. E. Hach III and C. C. Gerry, “Generation of mixtures of Schrödinger-cat states from a competitive two-photon process”, Physical Review A 49, 490 (1994) DOI

  14. [14]

    L. Gilles, B. M. Garraway, and P. L. Knight, “Generation of nonclassical light by dissipative two-photon processes”, Physical Review A 49, 2785 (1994) DOI

  15. [15]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Quantum Reservoir Engineering with Laser Cooled Trapped Ions”, Physical Review Letters 77, 4728 (1996) DOI

  16. [16]

    C. Chamberland et al., “Building a Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2012.04108 DOI

  17. [17]

    K. S. Dubovitskii, “Bit-flip errors in dissipative cat qubits: Second-order perturbation theory”, Physical Review A 111, (2025) arXiv:2407.17299 DOI

  18. [18]

    A. Wunsche, “Displaced Fock states and their connection to quasiprobabilities”, Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B 3, 359 (1991) DOI

  19. [19]

    T. G. Philbin, “Generalized coherent states”, American Journal of Physics 82, 742 (2014) arXiv:1311.1920 DOI

  20. [20]

    L. Carde, R. Gautier, N. Didier, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen, and A. McDonald, “Nonperturbative Switching Rates in Bistable Open Quantum Systems: From Driven Kerr Oscillators to Dissipative Cat Qubits”, Physical Review Letters 136, (2026) arXiv:2507.18714 DOI

  21. [21]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, “Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving”, npj Quantum Information 3, (2017) arXiv:1605.09408 DOI

  22. [22]

    H. Goto, “Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network”, Scientific Reports 6, (2016) arXiv:1510.02566 DOI

  23. [23]

    H. Putterman, J. Iverson, Q. Xu, L. Jiang, O. Painter, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and K. Noh, “Stabilizing a Bosonic Qubit Using Colored Dissipation”, Physical Review Letters 128, (2022) arXiv:2107.09198 DOI

  24. [24]

    R. Gautier, A. Sarlette, and M. Mirrahimi, “Combined Dissipative and Hamiltonian Confinement of Cat Qubits”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2112.05545 DOI

  25. [25]

    L. Gravina, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, “Critical Schrödinger Cat Qubit”, PRX Quantum 4, (2023) arXiv:2208.04928 DOI

  26. [26]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, “Quantum computation with optical coherent states”, Physical Review A 68, (2003) arXiv:quant-ph/0306004 DOI

  27. [27]

    H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, “Efficient quantum computation using coherent states”, Physical Review A 65, (2002) arXiv:quant-ph/0109077 DOI

  28. [28]

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, “Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscopically distinguishable states via amplitude dispersion”, Physical Review Letters 57, 13 (1986) DOI

  29. [29]

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, “Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation”, Physical Review X 9, (2019) arXiv:1904.09474 DOI

  30. [30]

    S. Puri et al., “Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits”, Science Advances 6, (2020) arXiv:1905.00450 DOI

  31. [31]

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, “Error rates and resource overheads of repetition cat qubits”, Physical Review A 103, (2021) arXiv:2009.10756 DOI

  32. [32]

    C. T. Hann, K. Noh, H. Putterman, M. H. Matheny, J. K. Iverson, M. T. Fang, C. Chamberland, O. Painter, and F. G. S. L. Brandão, “Hybrid Cat-Transmon Architecture for Scalable, Hardware-Efficient Quantum Error Correction”, PRX Quantum 6, (2025) arXiv:2410.23363 DOI

  33. [33]

    J. Hastrup and U. L. Andersen, “All-optical cat-code quantum error correction”, (2021) arXiv:2108.12225

  34. [34]

    C. M. Dawson, H. L. Haselgrove, and M. A. Nielsen, “Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation”, Physical Review A 73, (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0601066 DOI

  35. [35]

    E. Knill, “Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices”, Nature 434, 39 (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0410199 DOI

  36. [36]

    E. Knill, “Scalable Quantum Computation in the Presence of Large Detected-Error Rates”, (2004) arXiv:quant-ph/0312190

  37. [37]

    A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, “Fault-Tolerant Linear Optical Quantum Computing with Small-Amplitude Coherent States”, Physical Review Letters 100, (2008) arXiv:0707.0327 DOI

  38. [38]

    Z. Leghtas et al., “Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss”, Science 347, 853 (2015) arXiv:1412.4633 DOI

  39. [39]

    S. Touzard et al., “Coherent Oscillations inside a Quantum Manifold Stabilized by Dissipation”, Physical Review X 8, (2018) arXiv:1705.02401 DOI

  40. [40]

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, “Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit”, Nature 584, 205 (2020) arXiv:1907.12131 DOI

  41. [41]

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, “Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator”, Nature Physics 16, 509 (2020) arXiv:1907.11729 DOI

  42. [42]

    C. Berdou et al., “One Hundred Second Bit-Flip Time in a Two-Photon Dissipative Oscillator”, PRX Quantum 4, (2023) arXiv:2204.09128 DOI

  43. [43]

    U. Réglade et al., “Quantum control of a cat qubit with bit-flip times exceeding ten seconds”, Nature 629, 778 (2024) arXiv:2307.06617 DOI

  44. [44]

    A. Marquet et al., “Autoparametric Resonance Extending the Bit-Flip Time of a Cat Qubit up to 0.3 s”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2307.06761 DOI

  45. [45]

    V. V. Albert, C. Shu, S. Krastanov, C. Shen, R.-B. Liu, Z.-B. Yang, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and L. Jiang, “Holonomic Quantum Control with Continuous Variable Systems”, Physical Review Letters 116, (2016) arXiv:1503.00194 DOI

  46. [46]

    A. Hajr et al., “High-Coherence Kerr-Cat Qubit in 2D Architecture”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2404.16697 DOI

  47. [47]

    N. E. Frattini et al., “Observation of Pairwise Level Degeneracies and the Quantum Regime of the Arrhenius Law in a Double-Well Parametric Oscillator”, Physical Review X 14, (2024) arXiv:2209.03934 DOI

  48. [48]

    H. Putterman et al., “Preserving Phase Coherence and Linearity in Cat Qubits with Exponential Bit-Flip Suppression”, Physical Review X 15, (2025) arXiv:2409.17556 DOI

  49. [49]

    J. Guillaud, J. Cohen, and M. Mirrahimi, “Quantum computation with cat qubits”, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes (2023) arXiv:2203.03222 DOI

  50. [50]

    S. Puri, “QEC when the noise is biased”, Les Houches Summer School (2019) URL

  51. [51]

    S. Haroche and J.-M. Raimond, Exploring the Quantum (Oxford University Press, 2006) DOI

  52. [52]

    H. Jeong and T. C. Ralph, “Schrödinger Cat States for Quantum Information Processing”, Quantum Information with Continuous Variables of Atoms and Light 159 (2007) DOI

  53. [53]

    H. Bachor and T. C. Ralph, A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics (Wiley, 2019) DOI

  54. [54]

    S. Lieu, E. L. Rosenfeld, K. Noh, and C. T. Hann, “Viewing protected superconducting qubits through the lens of the cat qubit”, Physical Review A 112, (2025) arXiv:2501.16425 DOI

  55. [55]

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, “Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions”, Physical Review A 98, (2018) arXiv:1804.11293 DOI

  56. [56]

    S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, “Symmetry Breaking and Error Correction in Open Quantum Systems”, Physical Review Letters 125, (2020) arXiv:2008.02816 DOI

  57. [57]

    F. Yamaguchi, K. Nemoto, and W. J. Munro, “Quantum error correction via robust probe modes”, Physical Review A 73, (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0511098 DOI

  58. [58]

    S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and S. M. Girvin, “Stabilized Cat in a Driven Nonlinear Cavity: A Fault-Tolerant Error Syndrome Detector”, Physical Review X 9, (2019) arXiv:1807.09334 DOI

  59. [59]

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, “Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet”, Physical Review 58, 1098 (1940) DOI

  60. [60]

    C. D. Cushen and R. L. Hudson, “A quantum-mechanical central limit theorem”, Journal of Applied Probability 8, 454 (1971) DOI

  61. [61]

    A. Klein and E. R. Marshalek, “Boson realizations of Lie algebras with applications to nuclear physics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 63, 375 (1991) DOI

Page edit log

Your contribution is welcome!

on github.com (edit & pull request)

— see instructions

Zoo Code ID: two-legged-cat

Cite as:
“Two-component cat code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/two-legged-cat, arXiv:2606.11484
BibTeX:
@incollection{eczoo_two-legged-cat,
title={Two-component cat code},
booktitle={The Error Correction Zoo},
year={2026},
editor={Albert, Victor V. and Faist, Philippe},
eprint={2606.11484},
doi={10.48550/arXiv.2606.11484},
url={https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/two-legged-cat}
}
Share via:
Twitter | Mastodon |  | E-mail
Permanent link:
https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/two-legged-cat

Cite as:

“Two-component cat code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/two-legged-cat, arXiv:2606.11484

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/edit/main/codes/quantum/oscillators/qsc/cat/two-legged-cat.yml.