## Description

## Protection

An error set relevant to bosonic stabilizer codes is the set of displacement operators, a bosonic analogue of the Pauli string basis for qubit codes. For a single mode, its elements are products of exponentials of the mode's position and momentum operators, acting on the mode's position states \(|y\rangle\) for \(y\in\mathbb{R}\) as \begin{align} e^{-iq\hat{p}}\left|y\right\rangle =\left|y+q\right\rangle \,\,\text{ and }\,\,e^{iq\hat{x}}\left|y\right\rangle =e^{iq y}\left|y\right\rangle ~, \tag*{(1)}\end{align} where \(q\in\mathbb{R}\). For multiple modes, error set elements are tensor products of elements of the single-oscillator error set, characterized by the vector of coefficients \(\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{2n}\).

The displacement error set is a unitary basis for trace-class linear operators on the \(n\)-mode Hilbert space that is Dirac-orthonormal under the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product [1]. There are two definitions of code distance associated with displacements. The definition inherited from qubit codes is the minimum weight of a displacement operator (i.e., number of nonzero entries in \(\xi\)) that implements a nontrivial logical operation in the code. The second definition is the minimum Euclidean distance (i.e., \(\ell^2\)-norm of \(\xi\)) such that the corresponding displacement implements a nontrivial logical operation in the code.

An error set relevant to Fock-state bosonic codes is the set of loss operators associated with the amplitude damping (a.k.a. photon loss or attenuation) noise channel, a common form of physical noise in bosonic systems. For a single mode, loss operators are proportional to powers of the mode's annihilation operator \(a=(\hat{x}+i\hat{p})/\sqrt{2}\), where \(\hat x\) (\(\hat p\)) is the mode's position (momentum) operator, and with the power signifying the number of particles lost during the error. For multiple modes, error set elements are tensor products of elements of the single-mode error set. A definition of distance associated with this error set is the minimum weight of a loss error that implements a nontrivial logical operation in the code.

An related error set is the set of powers of the Susskind–Glogower phase operator \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{a a^\dagger}} a\) and its adjoint [2–4] along with Fock-space rotations generated by the occupation number operator \(a^\dagger a\). These can also be obtained from qudit Pauli matrices through a limiting procedure [4] and allow one to expand trace-class operators despite not forming an orthonormal set [5]. These operators are correspong to the number-phase interpretation, a polar-like decomposition of a single mode, complementing the cartesian-like decomposition in terms of position and momentum displacements.

## Rate

## Gates

## Notes

## Parent

- Group-based quantum code — Group quantum codes whose physical spaces are constructed using the group of the reals \(\mathbb{R}\) under addition are bosonic codes.

## Children

- Coherent-state constellation code
- Concatenated bosonic code
- Homological number-phase code — Homological number-phase codes are bosonic codes encoding logical qudits and/or logical rotors.
- Numerically optimized code
- Hybrid qudit-oscillator code — The physical Hilbert space of a hybrid qubit-oscillator code contains at least one oscillator.
- Oscillator-into-oscillator code — Oscillator-into-oscillator codes are bosonic codes with an infinite-dimensional logical subspace.
- Penrose tiling code — Penrose tiling codes encode information into Penrose tilings, which are non-periodic tilings of \(\mathbb{R}^n\).
- Qudit-into-oscillator code — Qudit-into-oscillator codes are bosonic codes with a finite-dimensional logical subspace.
- Bosonic stabilizer code

## Cousins

- Bosonic c-q code — Bosonic c-q codes are bosonic codes designed to transmit classical information.
- EA bosonic code — EA bosonic codes utilize additional ancillary modes in a pre-shared entangled state, but reduce to ordinary bosonic codes when said modes are interpreted as noiseless physical modes.
- Fermionic code — Bosonic (fermionic) codes are associated with bosonic (fermionic) degrees of freedom.

## References

- [1]
- K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, “Ordered Expansions in Boson Amplitude Operators”, Physical Review 177, 1857 (1969) DOI
- [2]
- L. Susskind and J. Glogower, “Quantum mechanical phase and time operator”, Physics Physique физика 1, 49 (1964) DOI
- [3]
- J. Bergou and B.-G. Englert, “Operators of the phase. Fundamentals”, Annals of Physics 209, 479 (1991) DOI
- [4]
- S. D. Bartlett, H. de Guise, and B. C. Sanders, “Quantum encodings in spin systems and harmonic oscillators”, Physical Review A 65, (2002) arXiv:quant-ph/0109066 DOI
- [5]
- V. V. Albert, “Bosonic coding: introduction and use cases”, (2022) arXiv:2211.05714
- [6]
- M. M. Wolf, D. Pérez-García, and G. Giedke, “Quantum Capacities of Bosonic Channels”, Physical Review Letters 98, (2007) arXiv:quant-ph/0606132 DOI
- [7]
- L. Lami and M. M. Wilde, “Exact solution for the quantum and private capacities of bosonic dephasing channels”, Nature Photonics 17, 525 (2023) arXiv:2205.05736 DOI
- [8]
- J. Harrington and J. Preskill, “Achievable rates for the Gaussian quantum channel”, Physical Review A 64, (2001) arXiv:quant-ph/0105058 DOI
- [9]
- K. Noh, V. V. Albert, and L. Jiang, “Quantum Capacity Bounds of Gaussian Thermal Loss Channels and Achievable Rates With Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Codes”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 65, 2563 (2019) arXiv:1801.07271 DOI
- [10]
- C. Weedbrook et al., “Gaussian quantum information”, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 621 (2012) arXiv:1110.3234 DOI
- [11]
- S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables”, Reviews of Modern Physics 77, 513 (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0410100 DOI
- [12]
- R.-B. Wu, T.-J. Tarn, and C.-W. Li, “Smooth controllability of infinite-dimensional quantum-mechanical systems”, Physical Review A 73, (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0505063 DOI
- [13]
- Y. Xu, Y. Wang, and V. V. Albert, “Clifford operations and homological codes for rotors and oscillators”, (2023) arXiv:2311.07679
- [14]
- B. M. Terhal, J. Conrad, and C. Vuillot, “Towards scalable bosonic quantum error correction”, Quantum Science and Technology 5, 043001 (2020) arXiv:2002.11008 DOI
- [15]
- A. Joshi, K. Noh, and Y. Y. Gao, “Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED”, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 033001 (2021) arXiv:2008.13471 DOI
- [16]
- W. Cai et al., “Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits”, Fundamental Research 1, 50 (2021) arXiv:2010.08699 DOI
- [17]
- K. Noh, “Quantum Computation and Communication in Bosonic Systems”, (2021) arXiv:2103.09445
- [18]
- S. M. Girvin, “Introduction to quantum error correction and fault tolerance”, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes (2023) arXiv:2111.08894 DOI
- [19]
- N. J. Cerf, G. Leuchs, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum Information with Continuous Variables of Atoms and Light (PUBLISHED BY IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS AND DISTRIBUTED BY WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING CO., 2007) DOI
- [20]
- A. Serafini, “Quantum Continuous Variables”, (2017) DOI
- [21]
- A. F. Kockum et al., “Lecture notes on quantum computing”, (2023) arXiv:2311.08445

## Page edit log

- Victor V. Albert (2022-05-08) — most recent
- Victor V. Albert (2021-11-24)

## Cite as:

“Bosonic code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/oscillators

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/tree/main/codes/quantum/oscillators/oscillators.yml.