[Jump to code hierarchy]

Galois-qudit RS code [1]

Alternative Names: Galois-qudit polynomial code (QPyC).

Description

A Galois-qudit CSS code family (with \(n\leq q\)) constructed using two RS codes over \(\mathbb{F}_q\).

Let \(C_1\) be a \([n,k_1,d_1]_q\) RS code and \(C_2^\perp\) be a \([n,k_1-k_2,d_2]_q\) RS code, modified such that \(C_2^\perp \subseteq C_1\) and \(0\le k_2 \le k_1 \le n\). Then, a Galois-qudit RS code is a pure \([[n,k_2,d]]_q\) Galois-qudit CSS code with \(d=\min(n-k_1+1,k_1-k_2+1)\). The code is the span of the basis codewords over \(\mathbb{F}_q\), \begin{align} |\overline{\beta_0,\cdots,\beta_{k_2-1}}\rangle = \sum_{(\beta_{k_2},\cdots,\beta_{k_1-1})\in \mathbb{F}_q^{k_1-k_2}} \bigotimes_{i=1}^{n} \left| \sum_{j=0}^{k_1-1} \beta_j \alpha_i^j \right\rangle,\tag*{$(1)$} \end{align}where \((\alpha_1, \cdots, \alpha_n)\) are \(n\) distinct points chosen for code \(C_1\) from \(\mathbb{F}_q\setminus \{0\}\), so that \(n<q\) [2].

Logical states can instead be labeled by the \(k_2\) highest-degree coefficients, with the superposition running over the \(k_1-k_2\) lowest-degree ones. Inverting the evaluation points and applying single-Galois-qudit multiplication gates maps the code above onto a code of this form with the same parameters. This second form also allows zero as an evaluation point, so that \(n\leq q\). The case \(n=q\), for which the evaluation points exhaust \(\mathbb{F}_q\), is constructed from extended GRS codes.

Protection

Galois-qudit RS codes can be adapted for insertion and deletion noise [3].

Magic

Punctured RS codes can be used for magic-state distillation with a spacetime overhead of \((\log \frac{1}{\epsilon})^{\gamma}\), with the magic-state scaling exponent \(\gamma \to 0\) with decreasing \(\epsilon\) [4].

Transversal and Permutation-Based Gates

There exists an order \([[n,\Theta(n),\Theta(n)]]_{n^2}\) punctured RS code family that admits (weakly) transversal \(CCZ_{n^2}\) gates for any three logical qudits [5]. This code can be treated as a qubit code by decomposing each Galois qudit into a Kronecker product of several qubits; see [2,6,8–10][7; Sec. 5.3]. This yields a qubit code family that is asymptotically good up to poly-logarithmic factors [5].Galois-qudit RS codes can be concatenated with quantum multiplication-friendly codes to yield CSS codes over a constant prime-power alphabet \(q\) admitting a transversal \(CCZ_q\) gate (and, for \(q \geq 5\), also a transversal \(U_q\) gate) with nearly linear code dimension and distance, \(k,d = \Omega(n/2^{O(\log^* n)})\), where \(\log^* n\) is the iterated logarithm (the number of times \(\log\) must be applied to \(n\) before the result is \(\leq 1\)) [9].

Fault Tolerance

The original prime-field construction admits a fault-tolerant universal gate set beyond the standard transversal gates for qudit CSS codes [1]. Generalized NOT, SUM, SWAP, scalar multiplication, and phase gates are implemented transversally. A logical Fourier transform is implemented by weighted physical Fourier transforms followed by code switching: a length-\(m\) degree-\(d\) code is mapped to the corresponding Fourier-dual code of degree \(m-d-1\). A transversal product gate \(|a\rangle|b\rangle|c\rangle \mapsto |a\rangle|b\rangle|c+ab\rangle\) maps into a degree-\(2d\) code, after which degree reduction switches back to the original degree.Aharonov and Ben-Or performed the code switching needed for their Fourier and product gates using concatenation and degree reduction [1]. The same switching between Galois-qudit RS codes of different degree can also be implemented by teleportation using encoded Bell states. This uses the transversal SUM gate between the two codes, with the lower-degree code serving as the control.Magic-state distillation with punctured Galois-qudit RS codes, combined with constant-rate QLTCs, yields fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant space overhead and time overhead that is logarithmic up to subpolylogarithmic factors [4], improving over previous schemes [11,12]. Recursively applying one fixed distillation circuit, based on a punctured \([[3q/4,q/4,\lfloor q/12\rfloor+1]]_q\) Galois-qudit RS code with \(q=2^\ell\) [13; Lemma 7.1], removes the subpolylogarithmic factor [13; Thm. 7.8].

Cousins

Primary Hierarchy

Parents
Galois-qudit RS codes are the Galois-qudit RM codes from the CSS construction with \(m=1\) whose two GRM codes are punctured to the same \(n\) evaluation points. For \(m=1\), GRM codes are extended RS codes [25]. Every Galois-qudit RS code takes this form when its logical states are labeled by the highest-degree coefficients, possibly after inverting the evaluation points and applying single-Galois-qudit multiplication gates.
Galois-qudit RS code
Children
Galois-qudit RS codes for prime-dimensional qudits are prime-qudit RS codes.
The \([[3,1,2]]_4\) code is constructed from the shortened RS\(_4\) code [26].

References

  1. [1]

    D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, “Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation With Constant Error Rate”, (1999) arXiv:quant-ph/9906129

  2. [2]

    D. Gottesman, Surviving as a Quantum Computer in a Classical World (2024) URL

  3. [3]

    M. Hagiwara, “Quantum Deletion Codes Derived From Quantum Reed-Solomon Codes”, (2023) arXiv:2306.13399

  4. [4]

    Q. T. Nguyen and C. A. Pattison, “Quantum fault tolerance with constant-space and logarithmic-time overheads”, (2025) arXiv:2411.03632

  5. [5]

    Z. He, V. Vaikuntanathan, A. Wills, and R. Y. Zhang, “Quantum Codes with Addressable and Transversal Non-Clifford Gates”, (2025) arXiv:2502.01864

  6. [6]

    A. Ashikhmin and E. Knill, “Nonbinary quantum stabilizer codes”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 47, 3065 (2001) DOI

  7. [7]

    A. Niehage, “Quantum Goppa Codes over Hyperelliptic Curves”, (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0501074

  8. [8]

    Q. T. Nguyen, “Good binary quantum codes with transversal CCZ gate”, (2024) arXiv:2408.10140

  9. [9]

    L. Golowich and V. Guruswami, “Asymptotically Good Quantum Codes with Transversal Non-Clifford Gates”, (2024) arXiv:2408.09254

  10. [10]

    M. Heinrich, “On stabiliser techniques and their application to simulation and certification of quantum devices”, PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, 2021.

  11. [11]

    H. Yamasaki and M. Koashi, “Time-Efficient Constant-Space-Overhead Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation”, Nature Physics 20, 247 (2024) arXiv:2207.08826 DOI

  12. [12]

    S. Yoshida, S. Tamiya, and H. Yamasaki, “Concatenate codes, save qubits”, npj Quantum Information 11, (2025) arXiv:2402.09606 DOI

  13. [13]

    Z. Han and Z.-W. Liu, “Purely-logarithmic-time- and constant-space-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation”, (2026) arXiv:2609.28461

  14. [14]

    Z. Li, L.-J. Xing, and X.-M. Wang, “A family of asymptotically good quantum codes based on code concatenation”, (2008) arXiv:0901.0042

  15. [15]

    G. G. La Guardia, R. Palazzo, and C. Lavor, “Nonbinary quantum Reed-Solomon codes”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 65(1), 55-63 (2010)

  16. [16]

    S. A. Aly, “On Quantum and Classical Error Control Codes: Constructions and Applications”, (2008) arXiv:0812.5104

  17. [17]

    G. G. La Guardia, “Asymmetric quantum Reed-Solomon and generalized Reed-Solomon codes”, Quantum Information Processing 11, 591 (2011) DOI

  18. [18]

    A. J. Scott, “Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions”, Physical Review A 69, (2004) arXiv:quant-ph/0310137 DOI

  19. [19]

    Z. Raissi, C. Gogolin, A. Riera, and A. Acín, “Optimal quantum error correcting codes from absolutely maximally entangled states”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51, 075301 (2018) arXiv:1701.03359 DOI

  20. [20]

    D. Alsina and M. Razavi, “Absolutely maximally entangled states, quantum-maximum-distance-separable codes, and quantum repeaters”, Physical Review A 103, (2021) arXiv:1907.11253 DOI

  21. [21]

    M. GRASSL, T. BETH, and M. RÖTTELER, “ON OPTIMAL QUANTUM CODES”, International Journal of Quantum Information 02, 55 (2004) arXiv:quant-ph/0312164 DOI

  22. [22]

    M. Marcolli, “Holographic Codes on Bruhat–Tits buildings and Drinfeld Symmetric Spaces”, (2018) arXiv:1801.09623

  23. [23]

    M. Heydeman, M. Marcolli, S. Parikh, and I. Saberi, “Nonarchimedean Holographic Entropy from Networks of Perfect Tensors”, (2018) arXiv:1812.04057

  24. [24]

    M. Grassl and M. Rotteler, “Quantum block and convolutional codes from self-orthogonal product codes”, Proceedings. International Symposium on Information Theory, 2005. ISIT 2005. 1018 (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0703181 DOI

  25. [25]

    P. K. Sarvepalli and A. Klappenecker, “Nonbinary Quantum Reed-Muller Codes”, (2005) arXiv:quant-ph/0502001

  26. [26]

    J. M. Koh, A. Gong, A. C. Diaconu, D. B. Tan, A. A. Geim, M. J. Gullans, N. Y. Yao, M. D. Lukin, and S. Majidy, “Entangling logical qubits without physical operations”, (2026) arXiv:2601.20927

Page edit log

Your contribution is welcome!

on github.com (edit & pull request)

— see instructions

Zoo Code ID: galois_polynomial

Cite as:
“Galois-qudit RS code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/galois_polynomial, arXiv:2606.11484
BibTeX:
@incollection{eczoo_galois_polynomial,
title={Galois-qudit RS code},
booktitle={The Error Correction Zoo},
year={2026},
editor={Albert, Victor V. and Faist, Philippe},
eprint={2606.11484},
doi={10.48550/arXiv.2606.11484},
url={https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/galois_polynomial}
}
Share via:
Twitter | Mastodon |  | E-mail
Permanent link:
https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/galois_polynomial

Cite as:

“Galois-qudit RS code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/galois_polynomial, arXiv:2606.11484

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/edit/main/codes/quantum/qudits_galois/stabilizer/evaluation/rs/galois_polynomial.yml.