BB5 code[1]
Description
A BB code with weight-five stabilizer generators (contrasting with the weight-six checks of standard BB codes), designed and benchmarked for long chains of trapped ions [1].
Two highlighted instances are \([[30,4,5]]\) and \([[48,4,7]]\) [1]. Their distances exceed those of BB6 codes with the polynomial form of Ref. [2] at the same \([[n,k]]\), namely \([[30,4,4]]\) and \([[48,4,6]]\) [1]. Other BB6 codes reach \([[30,4,6]]\) [3].
Fault Tolerance
Circuit-level simulations in [1] use BP-OSD for BB5 and BB6 instances under an ion-chain noise model.For physical error rate \(10^{-3}\), the \([[48,4,7]]\) BB5 instance achieves logical error rate per syndrome round and per logical qubit \(\approx 5\times 10^{-5}\), about \(4\times\) lower than the best BB6 baseline considered in [1]. In that comparison, it also matches the logical error rate of a distance-7 surface code while using about \(4\times\) fewer physical qubits per logical qubit.Primary Hierarchy
References
- [1]
- M. Ye and N. Delfosse, “Quantum error correction for long chains of trapped ions”, Quantum 9, 1920 (2025) arXiv:2503.22071 DOI
- [2]
- S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, “High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory”, Nature 627, 778 (2024) arXiv:2308.07915 DOI
- [3]
- M. Wang and F. Mueller, “Coprime Bivariate Bicycle Codes and Their Layouts on Cold Atoms”, Quantum 10, 2009 (2026) arXiv:2408.10001 DOI
Page edit log
- Victor V. Albert (2026-10-12) — most recent
- Victor V. Albert (2026-06-08)
- Victor V. Albert (2025-04-19)
Cite as:
“BB5 code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/bb5, arXiv:2606.11484