[Jump to code hierarchy]

Single-spin code[1]

Description

An encoding into a monolithic (i.e. non-tensor-product) Hilbert space that houses an irreducible representation of \(SU(2)\) or, more generally, another Lie group. In some cases, this space can be thought of as the permutation invariant subspace of a particular tensor-product space.

The analogue of oscillator coherent states for single spins are the spin coherent states [2].

Protection

For the \(SU(2)\) case, a continuous-time single-spin noise channel akin to the depolarizing channel is the Landau-Streater channel [3]. A particular error basis of interest consists of the spherical tensors [4].

The \(SU(2)\) Lie Algebra can also be used as a noise model; it connects states whose angular momentum projections differ by at most an integer [5]. More generally, the group’s Lie algebra induces a metric on the carrying vector space, and its operators can be chosen as a noise basis [1]. Code existence is guaranteed by the Tverberg theorem [1]. There are quantum MacWilliams identities for such metric spaces [1].

Rate

There exists a family of single-spin codes for \(SU(q=N)\) with logical dimension \(K = o(2^N)\) and distance of order \(o(N/\log N)\) [6].

Transversal Gates

When the physical Hilbert space is thought of a collective spin, logical gates for spin codes have the form \(U^{\otimes N}\), where \(U\) is a local rotation on the physical system.

Cousins

  • PI qubit code— Single-spin codes are subspaces of a single large \(SU(2)\) spin, which can be either standalone or correspond to the PI subspace of a set of spins via the Dicke state mapping.
  • Bosonic code— Bosonic states are typically represented with the assumption that a common phase reference exists, and the superselection rule compliant (SSRC) framework yields expressions without this assumption [713]. In this framework, single-mode states can be treated as two-mode states in a fixed subspace of total occupation number \(N\) in the limit \(N \to \infty\). Passive Gaussian operations acting on the fixed-photon subspace of two modes realize \(U(2)\) transformations in the Jordan-Schwinger boson mapping [1417].
  • Quantum spherical code (QSC)— Single-spin codes whose codewords are expressed in terms of discrete sets of spin-coherent states may also be interpreted as QSCs.
  • Permutation-invariant (PI) code— Modular-qudit PI codes can be converted to spin codes defined on the completely symmetric irrep of \(SU(q)\) via the simplex mapping [6; Prop. IV.2]. Any transversal gates are mapped to \(SU(q)\) gates on the spin codes [6].
  • Æ code— Since Æ codes are defined in a subspace of fixed total angular momentum and protect against errors linear in the momentum generators, they can also be thought of a single-spin codes.

References

[1]
C. Bumgardner, “Codes in W\ast-metric Spaces: Theory and Examples”, (2012) arXiv:1205.4517
[2]
J. M. Radcliffe, “Some properties of coherent spin states”, Journal of Physics A: General Physics 4, 313 (1971) DOI
[3]
L. J. Landau and R. F. Streater, “On Birkhoff’s theorem for doubly stochastic completely positive maps of matrix algebras”, Linear Algebra and its Applications 193, 107 (1993) DOI
[4]
S. Omanakuttan and J. A. Gross, “Multispin Clifford codes for angular momentum errors in spin systems”, Physical Review A 108, (2023) arXiv:2304.08611 DOI
[5]
J. A. Gross, “Designing Codes around Interactions: The Case of a Spin”, Physical Review Letters 127, (2021) arXiv:2005.10910 DOI
[6]
A. Aydin, V. V. Albert, and A. Barg, “Quantum error correction beyond \(SU(2)\): spin, bosonic, and permutation-invariant codes from convex geometry”, (2025) arXiv:2509.20545
[7]
Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind, “Charge Superselection Rule”, Physical Review 155, 1428 (1967) DOI
[8]
K. Mølmer, “Optical coherence: A convenient fiction”, Physical Review A 55, 3195 (1997) DOI
[9]
B. C. Sanders, S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and P. L. Knight, “Photon-number superselection and the entangled coherent-state representation”, Physical Review A 68, (2003) arXiv:quant-ph/0306076 DOI
[10]
S. D. BARTLETT, T. RUDOLPH, and R. W. SPEKKENS, “DIALOGUE CONCERNING TWO VIEWS ON QUANTUM COHERENCE: FACTIST AND FICTIONIST”, International Journal of Quantum Information 04, 17 (2006) arXiv:quant-ph/0507214 DOI
[11]
B. C. Sanders, “Review of entangled coherent states”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45, 244002 (2012) arXiv:1112.1778 DOI
[12]
E. Descamps, A. Saharyan, A. Chivet, A. Keller, and P. Milman, “Unified framework for bosonic quantum information encoding, resources and universality from superselection rules”, (2025) arXiv:2501.03943
[13]
A. Saharyan, E. Descamps, A. Keller, and P. Milman, “Resources for bosonic metrology: quantum-enhanced precision from a superselection rule perspective”, (2025) arXiv:2507.13245
[14]
P. Jordan, “Der Zusammenhang der symmetrischen und linearen Gruppen und das Mehrk�rperproblem”, Zeitschrift f�r Physik 94, 531 (1935) DOI
[15]
Schwinger, Julian. On Angular Momentum. Courier Dover Publications, 2015.
[16]
J. Schwinger, “Angular Momentum”, Quantum Mechanics 149 (2001) DOI
[17]
A. Klein and E. R. Marshalek, “Boson realizations of Lie algebras with applications to nuclear physics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 63, 375 (1991) DOI
Page edit log

Your contribution is welcome!

on github.com (edit & pull request)— see instructions

edit on this site

Zoo Code ID: single_spin

Cite as:
“Single-spin code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/single_spin
BibTeX:
@incollection{eczoo_single_spin, title={Single-spin code}, booktitle={The Error Correction Zoo}, year={2022}, editor={Albert, Victor V. and Faist, Philippe}, url={https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/single_spin} }
Share via:
Twitter | Mastodon |  | E-mail
Permanent link:
https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/single_spin

Cite as:

“Single-spin code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2022. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/single_spin

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/edit/main/codes/quantum/spins/single_spin/single_spin.yml.