W-state code [1]
Description
Approximate block quantum code whose encoding resembles the structure of the W state [2]. This code enables universal quantum computation with transversal gates.
The encoding is of a \(d_L\)-dimensional Hilbert space into \(n\) physical quantum systems, each associated with a Hilbert space of dimension \(d_L+1\): \begin{align}
Indeed, to apply any logical unitary \(U\) it suffices to apply \(U\) on each physical system, where the unitary is taken to act nontrivially only on the first \(d_L\) basis states of each system. Universal computation with transversal gates does not violate the Eastin-Knill theorem because this code is an approximate error-correcting code [1,3] rather than an exact error-correcting code.
Protection
The W state code is an approximate error-correcting code. Intuitively, if a subsystem is lost to the environment, the environment only gains access to \(\ket\psi\) with probability of order \(O(1/n)\). Under a single located erasure, the worst-case entanglement infidelity of the W state code can be upper bounded as \begin{align}
In contrast to the Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) code, the W state code does not saturate the scaling \(1/n\) in worst-case entanglement infidelity which is known to be optimal for covariant approximate error-correcting codes [1].
Encoding
There are complexity-theoretic bounds on \(W\)-state preparation [4].Transversal and Permutation-Based Gates
All logical gates can be implemented transversally. The logical unitary \(U_L\) can be performed with the physical unitary \(U_L\otimes U_L\otimes\cdots\otimes U_L\), where on the physical space \(U_L\) is taken to act trivially on \(\ket\perp\), i.e., \( U_L\ket\perp = \ket\perp\).Cousin
- Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) code— The W-state is not a unique ground state of any local Hamiltonian [5].
Primary Hierarchy
References
- [1]
P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill, “Continuous Symmetries and Approximate Quantum Error Correction”, Physical Review X 10, (2020) arXiv:1902.07714 DOI
- [2]
W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, “Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways”, Physical Review A 62, (2000) arXiv:quant-ph/0005115 DOI
- [3]
P. Hayden, S. Nezami, S. Popescu, and G. Salton, “Error Correction of Quantum Reference Frame Information”, PRX Quantum 2, (2021) arXiv:1709.04471 DOI
- [4]
J. Yi, R. Liu, and Z. Li, “Lovász Meets Lieb-Schultz-Mattis: Complexity in Approximate Quantum Error Correction”, (2025) arXiv:2510.04453
- [5]
L. Gioia and R. Thorngren, “\(W\) state is not the unique ground state of any local Hamiltonian”, (2024) arXiv:2310.10716
- [6]
M. V. den Nest, “A monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states”, New Journal of Physics 13, 123004 (2011) arXiv:1108.0531 DOI
Page edit log
- Victor V. Albert (2026-08-26) — most recent
- Victor V. Albert (2026-06-08)
- Victor V. Albert (2022-08-18)
- Philippe Faist (2022-08-18)
Cite as:
“W-state code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/w_state, arXiv:2606.11484