[Jump to code hierarchy]

Random quantum code

Description

Quantum code whose construction is non-deterministic in some way, i.e., codes that utilize an element of randomness somewhere in their construction. Members of this class range from fully non-deterministic codes (e.g., random-circuit codes), to codes whose multi-step construction is deterministic with the exception of a single step (e.g., expander lifted-product codes).

Protection

Certain random codes have nontrivial codespace complexity [1].

Rate

Haar random codes achieve the quantum Hamming bound [2].

Cousins

  • Random code— Random quantum codes are quantum analogues of random classical codes.
  • Perfect quantum code— Haar random codes achieve the quantum Hamming bound [2].
  • Bosonic rotation code— Random bosonic rotation codes can outperform cat and binomial codes when loss rate is large relative to dephasing rate [3].
  • NTRU-GKP code— Several NTRU lattices come from randomized constructions, yielding constant-rate GKP code families whose largest decodable displacement length scales as \(O(\sqrt{n})\) with high probability.
  • Covariant block quantum code— Random \(U(1)\)-covariant [4] and \(U(d)\)-covariant [5,6] approximate QECCs exist.
  • Quantum locally recoverable code (QLRC)— Random QLRCs with qudit dimension \(q = 2^{O(r)}\) achieve a relative distance that is order \(O(1/r)\) below the Singleton-like QLRC bound [7; Prop. 5].

Primary Hierarchy

Parents
Random codes typically correct errors on average.
Random quantum code
Children
QPRC keys are sampled at random, and the recovery channel averaged over the key is negligibly close to the identity in diamond distance [8].

References

  1. [1]

    J. Yi, W. Ye, D. Gottesman, and Z.-W. Liu, “Complexity and order in approximate quantum error-correcting codes”, Nature Physics 20, 1798 (2024) arXiv:2310.04710 DOI

  2. [2]

    F. Ma, X. Tan, and J. Wright, “Haar random codes attain the quantum Hamming bound, approximately”, (2025) arXiv:2510.07158

  3. [3]

    S. Totey, A. Kyle, S. Liu, P. J. Barge, N. Lordi, and J. Combes, “The performance of random bosonic rotation codes”, (2023) arXiv:2311.16089

  4. [4]

    L. Kong and Z.-W. Liu, “Charge-conserving unitaries typically generate optimal covariant quantum error-correcting codes”, (2021) arXiv:2102.11835

  5. [5]

    P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill, “Continuous Symmetries and Approximate Quantum Error Correction”, Physical Review X 10, (2020) arXiv:1902.07714 DOI

  6. [6]

    L. Kong and Z.-W. Liu, “Near-Optimal Covariant Quantum Error-Correcting Codes from Random Unitaries with Symmetries”, PRX Quantum 3, (2022) arXiv:2112.01498 DOI

  7. [7]

    L. Golowich and V. Guruswami, “Quantum Locally Recoverable Codes”, (2023) arXiv:2311.08653

  8. [8]

    M.-H. Hsieh and S. Yamada, “Quantum Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codes”, (2026) arXiv:2609.38986

Page edit log

Your contribution is welcome!

on github.com (edit & pull request)

— see instructions

Zoo Code ID: quantum_random

Cite as:
“Random quantum code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/quantum_random, arXiv:2606.11484
BibTeX:
@incollection{eczoo_quantum_random,
title={Random quantum code},
booktitle={The Error Correction Zoo},
year={2026},
editor={Albert, Victor V. and Faist, Philippe},
eprint={2606.11484},
doi={10.48550/arXiv.2606.11484},
url={https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/quantum_random}
}
Share via:
Twitter | Mastodon |  | E-mail
Permanent link:
https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/quantum_random

Cite as:

“Random quantum code”, The Error Correction Zoo (V. V. Albert & P. Faist, eds.), 2026. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/quantum_random, arXiv:2606.11484

Github: https://github.com/errorcorrectionzoo/eczoo_data/edit/main/codes/quantum/properties/quantum_random.yml.